基于RUSLE、InVEST和USPED的土壤侵蚀量估算对比研究 ——以陕北延河流域为例
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

北京师范大学地理科学学部 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0501604);中央高校基本科研业务费专项


A comparative study of soil erosion estimation based on RUSLE, InVEST and USPED models: A case study of the Yanhe River Basin in Northern Shaanxi
Author:
Affiliation:

Beijing Normal University

Fund Project:

The National Key Research Program of China (2016YFC0501604); The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    黄土高原是我国水土流失的重灾区,准确地估算土壤侵蚀量对于当地的退耕还林、水土保持以及土地管理等措施的实行具有重要的指导意义。本研究选取黄土高原延河流域为研究区,以2000年、2005年、2010年和2015年共4期的Landsat TM遥感影像及日降雨量、土地利用、数字高程模型和土壤属性等为源数据,比较RUSLE、InVEST和USPED三个模型对土壤侵蚀的估算在该研究区的适用性,并分析不同地形和植被条件下土壤侵蚀的分布及变化规律。研究发现:1)2000年后延河流域土壤侵蚀量先增加后减少,2005年后减少幅度逐渐增加,表明退耕还林工程效果显著;2)与实测产沙量数据相比,RUSLE模型估算的侵蚀量偏大,USPED模型和InVEST模型的误差相对较低,建议在延河流域使用InVEST和USPED模型计算土壤侵蚀;3)土壤侵蚀量随坡度的增加而增加,RUSLE模型增加幅度最大;4)当NDVI > 0时,土壤侵蚀量随NDVI的增加而减少,并且当NDVI在0 ~ 0.1时,土壤侵蚀量最大。

    Abstract:

    The Loess Plateau suffers from severe soil erosion in China. The accurate estimation of soil erosion has important guiding significance for the implementation of local projects such as land management, water and soil conservation. In this study, we selected Yanhe River Basin as the study area, and four years Landsat TM remote sensing data (in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015), rainfall, land use, DEM and soil properties as the source data. We compare the RUSLE, InVEST and USPED models in the studied area. We analyze the prediction accuracy under different terrains and vegetation distributions. The results showed that (1) soil erosion in the Yanhe River Basin increased first and then decreased from 2000. The reduction gradually increased after 2005. It indicates that the project of Grain for Green had a significant effect; (2) compared with the sediment yield data, the amount of soil erosion predicted by the RUSLE model are relatively large, and the USPED and InVEST models are more accurate than RUSLE model. Therefore, the InVEST and USPED models are suggested to predict soil erosion in the Yanhe River Basin; (3) soil erosion increased with the increase of slope, and the RUSLE model increased the most; (4) when NDVI > 0, soil erosion decreased with the increase of NDVI; and when NDVI was between 0 and 0.1, soil erosion was the largest.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

翟睿洁,赵文武,贾立志. 基于RUSLE、InVEST和USPED的土壤侵蚀量估算对比研究 ——以陕北延河流域为例[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(6): 1059-1068
ZHAI Rui-jie, ZHAO Wen-wu, JIA Li-zhi. A comparative study of soil erosion estimation based on RUSLE, InVEST and USPED models: A case study of the Yanhe River Basin in Northern Shaanxi[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(6): 1059-1068

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-08
  • 最后修改日期:2020-11-06
  • 录用日期:2020-11-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
版权所有:《农业现代化研究》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市芙蓉区远大二路644号
电话:0731-84615231    E-mail:nyxdhyj@isa.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司