高级检索

不同模式下农村宅基地退出的风险评价及防范对策研究——以福建省晋江市为例

Research on the risk evaluation and prevention measures of rural residential land withdrawal under different modes: A case study of Jinjiang City, Fujian Province

  • 摘要: 开展不同模式下农村宅基地退出的风险评价及其防范对策研究是合理引导农户退出宅基地的前提条件。基于农户的微观福利视角,构建宅基地退出后的风险识别指标体系,利用福建省晋江市的调研数据,运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法,对不同模式下宅基地退出的风险进行综合评价,探讨并提出对应的防范对策。结果表明:晋江市农村宅基地退出主要有指标置换和资产置换两种模式。总体来看,两种宅基地退出模式的综合风险分值均处于中警级别,两种模式对农户宅基地退出都具有比较较大的影响。政策了解程度在两种模式中均处于重警级别,农户的知情权没有得到切实保障;家庭日常支出和人均居住面积在资产置换模式下处于重警级别。研究表明,不同模式下宅基地退出的基本动机和政策安排存在差异,使其对农户产生的影响有所不同。因此,在宅基地退出过程中应科学设定补偿标准和范围、规范宅基地退出程序和采取差别化的方式来推动农户参与,进而为农户退出宅基地提供针对性的风险防范对策。

     

    Abstract: Evaluating the risks and exploring the prevention measures of rural residential land withdrawal under different modes are critical to guide rural households to withdraw from residential land rationally. Based on a survey data of farmers in Jinjiang City of Fujian Province, and applying the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) method, this paper constructed a residential land withdrawal risk identification index system from the perspective of farmers’ micro welfare to comprehensively evaluate the risks of residential land withdrawal under different modes. Results show that there is two main modes of residential land withdrawal, including index replacement and asset replacement, in Jinjiang City. In general, the comprehensive risk scores of the two modes are both in the middle alert levels. Both of the two modes have great influences on the residential land withdrawal for farmers. Farmers’ understanding degree of policy is at the heavy alert level from the perspectives of the internal indicators of both modes. It is at the level of heavy alert for the internal indexes of household daily expenditure and per capita living area under the mode of asset replacement. This research also finds that there are differences in the basic motivation and institutional arrangement of residential land withdrawal under two modes, which have different influences on farmers. To provide targeted risk prevention countermeasures for farmers to withdraw residential land, this paper suggests to raise the compensation standard and scope scientifically, to standardize the procedure of residential land withdrawal, and to adopt differentiated approaches to promote farmers to participate.

     

/

返回文章
返回