高级检索

农户对不同类型农业产业带动模式选择——基于一个博弈理论模型

Farmers’ choice for different types of agricultural industrialization drive modes: Based on a game theory model

  • 摘要: 农业产业化是我国农业经营体制机制的创新和发展方向,对于新时期促进农民增收和农业转型具有重要意义。通过对龙头企业带动型、合作社联动型和合作社一体化三种农业产业化模式基本内涵的阐述,运用完全静态信息博弈模型,探讨三种农业产业化模式中的农户利益所得。研究表明,合作社一体化是最优的农业产业化模式,农户在其中获得最大化收益。但采用平均定价法不如采用区别定价法,平均定价法低使得生产低质量产品的农户发生“搭便车行为”,削弱了农户入社积极性与合作社的惠农效应;而区别定价法则促进龙头企业与合作社之间的竞争,有助于合作社争取更大的市场份额。随着流通中介组织的进一步发展,农业产业化模式最终会演变为合作社一体化或农工商一体化模式。因此,未来需要进一步规范和加快合作社发展,将提升农产品质量安全作为提高农户生产效益的有效途径;根据不同地区农业经济的发展阶段和现状,合理选择农业产业化模式。

     

    Abstract: Agricultural industrialization is the innovation and development direction of agricultural management system in our country. It is critical to increase farmers’ income and agricultural transformation in the new age. Applying a full static information game model, this paper investigated the income of farmers from three kinds of agricultural industrialization modes, including leading enterprises, collaborative cooperatives and integrated cooperatives. Results shows that the integrated cooperatives is the optimal agricultural industrialization mode, which can maximize farmers’ revenue. For cooperatives, the differentiated pricing method is better than the average pricing method since the differentiated pricing method can avoid the “free-rider” problem and improve members’ overall benefits. The model of agricultural industrialization will eventually evolve into the integrated cooperatives. To improve production efficiency, this paper suggests that to accelerate and standardize the development of cooperatives and to enhance the quality and safety of agricultural products. The local government should choose a reasonable agricultural industrialization model according to the different stages of agricultural economic development and situation.

     

/

返回文章
返回