高级检索

渠道多样性对生态农产品溢价的影响

The influence of channel diversity on the price premium of ecological agricultural products

  • 摘要: 厘清渠道多样性对生态农产品溢价支付意愿的影响及其作用机制,对优化生态农产品流通体系具有重要意义。基于社会认知理论与风险传播理论,利用覆盖全国31个省份的1 500份消费者问卷数据,采用基准回归、调节效应模型、Bootstrap并行中介模型和工具变量法进行实证检验。结果表明:1)渠道多样性显著降低消费者的溢价支付意愿,经过内生性与稳健性检验后结论依然成立,且该负向影响在信任基础设施较不完善地区更强。渠道异质性分析显示,使用线上渠道时负向影响更强,其中社交电商最为突出;与使用1种渠道相比,使用3种及以上渠道的消费者的溢价支付意愿显著较低。分组结果显示,该负向关系在年长、高收入、较低学历和城镇消费者中相对较强,在谷物、杂粮与豆类产品中更为明显。2)品牌信任在购买决策中的作用、环保意识和渠道协同能够缓解渠道多样性的负向影响,而渠道冲突会强化这一影响。3)信息可靠性发挥部分中介作用,并行模型的总间接效应占总效应的20.6%,其中信息验证和认证标识两条路径合计占总间接效应的89.0%。研究揭示了渠道多样性影响生态农产品溢价支付意愿的作用机制与边界条件,为完善渠道协同和市场信任体系提供了实证依据。

     

    Abstract: Understanding how channel diversity affects consumers’ willingness to pay a premium for ecological agricultural products and through which mechanisms is important for improving the distribution system for these products. Drawing on social cognitive theory and risk communication theory, this study uses survey data from 1,500 consumers across 31 provinces in China and conducts empirical analyses using baseline regressions, moderating-effect models, a bootstrap parallel mediation model, and an instrumental-variable approach. The results show that: 1) Channel diversity significantly reduces consumers’ willingness to pay a premium. This finding remains robust after accounting for endogeneity and conducting a series of robustness checks, and the negative effect is stronger in regions with less-developed trust infrastructure. Channel heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative effect is stronger among consumers using online channels, particularly social e-commerce. Compared with consumers using only one channel, those using three or more channels have a significantly lower willingness to pay a premium. Subgroup analysis further indicates that this negative relationship is relatively stronger among older, higher-income, less-educated, and urban consumers, and is more pronounced for grains, coarse cereals, and legumes. 2) Greater reliance on brand trust in purchase decisions, stronger environmental awareness, and greater channel synergy mitigate the negative effect of channel diversity, whereas channel conflict reinforces it. 3) Information reliability partially mediates the relationship between channel diversity and willingness to pay a premium. The total indirect effect in the parallel mediation model accounts for 20.6% of the total effect, with the information verification and certification labeling pathways jointly accounting for 89.0% of the total indirect effect. These findings clarify the mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying the effect of channel diversity on consumers’ willingness to pay a premium for ecological agricultural products and provide empirical evidence for strengthening channel coordination and market trust systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回