高级检索

生计韧性视角下农业强国发展模式的差异化选择以河南省18个地市为例

Differentiated selection of agricultural power development modes from the perspective of livelihood resilience: evidence from 18 prefecture-level cities in Henan Province

  • 摘要: 在地缘政治冲突和经济逆全球化背景下,粮食安全、农业劳动力质量及农业技术创新等问题日益突出,农业强国建设亟需从“粗放式推进”向“精准化发展”转型。本研究以2010—2023年河南省18个地市为例,构建农业发展模式库与生计韧性指标体系,运用熵权法测度生计韧性值,并结合农业发展模式库数据,通过模型效果对比,最终选用随机森林(RF)与地理加权随机森林(GWRF)模型进行分析。研究发现:1)从全局角度看,农业发展模式呈现向智慧农业和交互式农业为主的新型模式转变;2)从时序角度看,2015年前河南省关键农业发展模式以集体农业为主导,2015年后以智慧农业为主导;3)从空间角度看,不同模式存在显著区域差异,如观光农业主要集中在河南中西部及南部,而智慧农业主要分布在中部及南部地区;4)从时空综合角度看,河南省各地市的关键农业发展模式总体以智慧农业为主,集体农业为辅。

     

    Abstract: Under the context of geopolitical conflicts and economic deglobalization, challenges related to food security, the quality of the agricultural labor force, and innovation in agricultural technology have become increasingly prominent. Advancing the construction of an agricultural powerhouse in China therefore requires a transition from extensive promotion to precision-oriented development. Using 18 prefecture-level cities in Henan Province from 2010 to 2023 as a case study, this research develops an agricultural development mode base and a livelihood resilience indicator system. The entropy weight method is applied to measure livelihood resilience. These results are then integrated with the agricultural development mode base, and comparative model evaluation is conducted. Based on model performance, the Random Forest (RF) and Geographically Weighted Random Forest (GWRF) algorithms are selected for analysis. The findings show the following: 1) At the overall level, agricultural development modes have been shifting toward new types mainly represented by smart agriculture and interactive agriculture. 2) From a temporal perspective, collective agriculture dominated the key agricultural development modes before 2015, while smart agriculture became the dominant mode after 2015. 3) From a spatial perspective, the modes display significant regional differences. For example, agrotourism is concentrated in the central, western, and southern parts of Henan, while smart agriculture is primarily distributed in the central and southern regions. 4) From a combined spatiotemporal perspective, the key agricultural development modes across cities in Henan Province are generally dominated by smart agriculture, with collective agriculture serving as a secondary mode.

     

/

返回文章
返回