高级检索

中国农村精明收缩的综合测度、时空分异及其影响因素研究

Comprehensive measurement, spatiotemporal differentiation, and influencing factors of smart shrinkage in rural China

  • 摘要: 随着城镇化进程加快,中国许多农村地区持续面临收缩压力。科学测度和分析农村收缩水平及其时空分异特征,对于推动农村精明收缩、促进城乡融合及实现乡村高质量发展具有重要意义。本研究基于2006—2021年中国30个省份面板数据,从人口、空间、经济和社会四个维度构建农村精明收缩综合测度体系,分析不同地区农村精明收缩的程度及其影响因素。结果表明:1)中国农村精明收缩总体呈“稳态演进、局部跃迁”特征,整体处于Ⅱ~Ⅲ级水平,但收缩强度存在显著的时空异质性;2)时序演化可分为下降、回弹、平稳和跃升四个阶段,呈现明显的阶段性跃迁特征;3)空间格局由初期“东高西低”的单极分布,逐步演化为“东部引领-中部蓄势-西部追赶”的梯度协同模式;4)内生因素(如养老服务、产业规模)与政策调控等外生因素共同作用,其中政府执行力主导西部地区,产业发展驱动东中部地区,阶段差异显著;5)城镇化率提升导致农村人口流失与要素失衡,削弱产业活力,形成“虹吸效应—收缩阻滞”的负向循环。

     

    Abstract: With the acceleration of urbanization, many rural areas in China are facing continuous shrinkage pressure. Scientific measurement and analysis of the level of rural shrinkage and its spatial and temporal differentiation are of great significance for guiding rural smart shrinkage, promoting urban-rural integration, and achieving high-quality rural development and rural revitalization. Based on panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2021, this study constructs a comprehensive measurement system of rural smart shrinkage from four dimensions: demographic, spatial, economic, and social, and analyzes the degree of rural smart shrinkage and its influencing factors across different regions. The results show that: 1) China’s rural smart shrinkage presents a pattern of “overall steady evolution with local transitions,” remaining mainly at levels II–III, while shrinkage intensity demonstrates significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity; 2) The temporal evolution can be divided into four distinct stages: decline, rebound, stabilization, and leapfrogging, showing clear phase transitions; 3) The spatial pattern has shifted from an initial “east-high and west-low” unipolar structure to a gradient synergy of “eastern leadership, central accumulation, and western catch-up”; 4)Endogenous factors such as elderly care services and industrial scale interact with exogenous factors such as policy regulation. Government implementation capacity plays the dominant role in western regions, while industrial development drives the central and eastern regions, with significant phase-specific differences; 5)Rising urbanization intensifies rural population loss and factor imbalance, weakens industrial vitality, and creates a negative cycle of “siphoning effect and shrinkage inhibition.”

     

/

返回文章
返回