高级检索

乡村现代化的理论内涵、国际经验与中国实践

Rural modernization: theoretical framework, international experience, and Chinese practice

  • 摘要: 在全球现代化进程持续推进与城乡关系深度重塑的背景下,乡村现代化已成为各国实现可持续发展的重要议题。本文立足全球比较视野与中国本土实践,系统阐释了乡村现代化的理论内涵、演进路径与实践范式。研究发现,全球乡村现代化并非单一线性趋同过程,而是在不同资源禀赋、制度环境与发展阶段作用下,形成了以市场主导、规划引领、文化驱动及约束适应等为代表的多样化发展路径。尽管实现方式各异,其演进方向具有一定共性,主要体现为农民专业化与组织化程度提升、农地集约利用与生态约束同步强化以及农业功能由单一生产向多元价值创造拓展。面向中国情境,研究构建了一个以“人的现代化”为价值原点,以“人-地-业”三大核心要素耦合为分析主线,以产业、社会、文化、生态、治理“五大体系”为功能目标体系的整合性理论框架。结合中国乡村人口变迁、农地利用调整与农业产业演进的实证分析,本文指出,当前中国乡村现代化进程中仍普遍存在主体活力不足、要素配置失衡与产业效能偏低等突出问题。研究表明,中国乡村的高质量发展难以简单移植任何单一国外模式,其根本路径在于构建以内生协同动力为核心的发展机制,即通过科技创新重塑产业内核、深化改革激活要素潜能、城乡融合拓展系统边界。这一探索不仅为中国式现代化夯实了农村基础,也为全球尤其是现代化后发国家的乡村转型,提供了兼顾效率与公平、统筹国家战略与社区韧性的中国经验与发展范式。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of ongoing global modernization and the profound restructuring of urban-rural relations, rural modernization has become a critical issue for achieving sustainable development worldwide. Drawing on a global perspective and China’s local practice, this paper systematically elucidates the theoretical connotations, evolutionary trajectories, and practical paradigms of rural modernization. The research finds that rural modernization worldwide is not a single linear process of convergence; but rather a diversified development path characterized by market-led, planning-oriented, culture-driven, and constraint-adaptive models, influenced by varying resource endowments, institutional environments, and development stages. Despite their differences, these pathways share common features, including increased farmer specialization and organization, simultaneous strengthening of intensive farmland use and ecological constraints, and the expansion of agricultural functions from single-production to multi-value creation. Addressing the Chinese context, the study develops an integrative theoretical framework that takes “the modernization of the people” as its value origin, the coupling of three core elements people-land-industry as its analytical axis, and the five-dimensional system comprising industry, society, culture, ecology, and governance as its functional objective architecture. Based on empirical analyses of the dynamics of China’s rural population, adjustments in agricultural land use, and the transformation of the agricultural industry, this paper points out that the prominent issues such as insufficient vitality of stakeholders, imbalanced allocation of resources, and relatively low industrial efficiency remain prevalent in the current process of China’s rural modernization. The research indicates that high-quality development in rural China cannot be achieved by simply transplanting any single foreign model. Instead, it requires the construction of an endogenous and synergistic development mechanism, centered on reshaping industrial foundations through technological innovation, activating the factor potential by institutional reform, and expanding the system’s boundaries via urban-rural integration. This exploration not only consolidates the rural foundation for Chinese-style modernization but also offers Chinese experience and a new rural development paradigm for global rural transformation, particularly for late-modernizing countries, balancing efficiency and equity, and coordinating national strategies with community resilience.

     

/

返回文章
返回