文章摘要
广西县域农村发展与交通优势度的空间协同性及互动效应研究
Spatial integration and interaction between transportation advantage and rural development in Guangxi Province
投稿时间:2018-08-16  最后修改时间:2019-02-13
DOI:10.13872/j.1000-0275.2019.0021
中文关键词: 农村发展  交通优势度  耦合协同性  互动效应  广西
英文关键词: rural development  transportation dominance index (transportation advantages)  integrated coordination  interaction effects  Guangxi
基金项目:广西高校中青年教师基础能力提升项目(KY2016LX447、KY2016YB514);国家社会科学基金项目(17BMZ125)
作者单位E-mail
李柏敏 广西民族师范学院 libaimin01@126.com 
韦福安 广西民族师范学院 weifuan@gxnun.edu.cn 
陈严武 广西民族师范学院 chenyanwu@gxnun.edu.cn 
董金义 广西民族师范学院 dongjinyi@gxnun.edu.cn 
羊绍全 广西民族师范学院 yangshaoquan@gxnun.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 666
全文下载次数: 375
中文摘要:
      本研究从社会经济基础、农业生产与农民生活水平、社会支撑基础3个方面构建农村发展评价模型,定量分析广西农村发展与交通优势度的空间协同性及二者相互驱动机制和效应。结果显示:1)在全域空间范围内,农村发展水平对交通优势度的驱动效应比交通优势度对农村发展水平的驱动效应大。2)在局域空间范围内,二者相互驱动效应存在空间异质性。两者相互驱动发展模式可分为相互强驱动、相互较强驱动、相互较弱驱动、相互弱驱动(无明显驱动)、农业发展水平强驱动、农业发展水平较强驱动、农业发展水平较弱驱动、交通优势度强驱动、交通优势度较强驱动和交通优势度较弱驱动十种。3)广西整体农村发展水平较低,增速较慢且县域间差异逐渐增大,农村发展水平与交通优势度水平耦合协调度不高。
英文摘要:
      Based on social-economic basis, agricultural productivity and farmers’ living standard, and social support foundation and applying the quantitative analysis method, this paper examined the mechanism and interaction effects between rural development and transportation advantage in Guangxi Province. Result show that: 1) From the whole province perspective, the effects of rural development driven by transportation advantage were stronger than the effects of transportation advantage driven by rural development; 2) From regional perspective, the interaction mechanism between rural development and transportation advantage showed significant heterogeneity with ten different patterns, including: mutual strong to strong, mutual less than strong to less than strong, mutual better than weak to better than weak, mutual weak to weak, strong agricultural development driven, less than strong agricultural development driven, better than weak agricultural development driven, strong transportation advantage driven, less than strong transportation advantage driven, and better than weak transportation advantage driven; and 3) The provincial rural development level was low with slow growth and increasing regional heterogeneity, and the integration degree between rural development and transportation advantages was low, too.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭